A clinical trial involving 160 sedentary individuals with an average age of 70 and a BMI of 35 evaluated the effects of different exercise types on physical performance after six months. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: aerobic training, resistance training, combined aerobic and resistance training, or no exercise (control group). The study found that combined aerobic and resistance exercise significantly improved physical performance compared to aerobic or resistance training alone.

The Physical Performance Test score increased more in the combination group, suggesting enhanced mobility and strength. However, a potential confounding factor was the increased overall time spent exercising in the combination group compared to the aerobic and resistance groups. This difference in exercise duration might have contributed to the improved results in the combination group. Despite this, the study clearly demonstrated that combining both aerobic and resistance exercise offers more comprehensive benefits for older adults who are both sedentary and obese.

These benefits extend beyond performance, with the combination group showing improvements in cardiovascular fitness and strength. These findings underline the importance of varied exercise routines in promoting overall physical health, particularly in older adults aiming to improve their functional status.

Dr. Tashko


NEJM, Randomized Trial, May 2017

Background: Obesity causes frailty in older adults; however, weight loss might accelerate age-related loss of muscle and bone mass and resultant sarcopenia and osteopenia.

Methods: In this clinical trial involving 160 obese older adults, we evaluated the effectiveness of several exercise modes in reversing frailty and preventing reduction in muscle and bone mass induced by weight loss. Participants were randomly assigned to a weight-management program plus one of three exercise programs — aerobic training, resistance training, or combined aerobic and resistance training — or to a control group (no weight-management or exercise program). The primary outcome was the change in Physical Performance Test score from baseline to 6 months (scores range from 0 to 36 points; higher scores indicate better performance). Secondary outcomes included changes in other frailty measures, body composition, bone mineral density, and physical functions.

Results: A total of 141 participants completed the study.

Physical Performance Test score increased more in the combination group than in the aerobic and resistance groups (27.9 to 33.4 points [21% increase] vs. 29.3 to 33.2 points [14% increase] and 28.8 to 32.7 points [14% increase], respectively; P=0.01 and P=0.02 after Bonferroni correction); the scores increased more in all exercise groups than in the control group (P<0.001 for between-group comparisons).

Peak oxygen consumption (milliliters per kilogram of body weight per minute) increased more in the combination and aerobic groups (17.2 to 20.3 [17% increase] and 17.6 to 20.9 [18% increase], respectively) than in the resistance group (17.0 to 18.3 [8% increase]) (P<0.001 for both comparisons).

Strength increased more in the combination and resistance groups (272 to 320 kg [18% increase] and 288 to 337 kg [19% increase], respectively) than in the aerobic group (265 to 270 kg [4% increase]) (P<0.001 for both comparisons).

Body weight decreased by 9% in all exercise groups but did not change significantly in the control group.

Lean mass decreased less in the combination and resistance groups than in the aerobic group (56.5 to 54.8 kg [3% decrease] and 58.1 to 57.1 kg [2% decrease], respectively, vs. 55.0 to 52.3 kg [5% decrease]), as did at the total hip (grams per square centimeter; 1.010 to 0.996 [1% decrease] and 1.047 to 1.041 [0.5% decrease], respectively, vs. 1.018 to 0.991 [3% decrease]) (P<0.05 for all comparisons). Exercise-related adverse events included musculoskeletal injuries.

Conclusions: Of the methods tested, weight loss plus combined aerobic and resistance exercise was the most effective in improving functional status of obese older adults.